jervalaw

Social Security Disability & Why the Vocational Expert Could Win or Lose the Case



Posted: Monday, August 13, 2007

by
Law Office of Jerry Lutkenhaus

This is why the Vocational Expert is important at a disability hearing.

Mr. Smith came to me after he has lost his Virginia Social Security disability hearing. He said there was some "doctor" at the hearing. This "doctor" said Mr. Smith could work as a cashier, information clerk, or credit clerk but Mr. Smith complained he had only worked construction. How could he say I could do jobs that I have never done before? Mr. Smith did not understand his claim and that is why he lost his case. A short explanation of the role of the Vocational Expert will illustrate his mistake.

The Vocational Expert (VE) will be a person who specializes in Vocational Rehabilitation. He will often have a PhD in this field. Thus, he will not be a medical doctor but he often will have a doctorate in the field of rehabilitation.

Prior to the hearing, the Social Security Judge will send out a notice about the hearing. This notice will also say whether or not a VE will be asked to testify at the hearing. It will list the name of the VE.

Usually, the Judge will want a VE at the hearing because he has reviewed the file and has made a preliminary decision that the claimant cannot do his past relevant work (PRW) based on the medical evidence. Social Security then has the burden of proof to show what light or sedentary jobs the claimant can do with his work restrictions. The easiest way for the Judge to meet Social Security's burden of proof is by using the VE. He will ask the VE a hypothetical question such as assuming the claimant cannot stand for more than two hours in a day and cannot lift more than ten pounds is there any jobs in the national economy this former construction worker can do? The VE will then list jobs such as cashier, information clerk, or credit clerk. These are jobs within the restrictions listed by the Judge. Because there are jobs Mr. Smith could still do the Judge found he was not disabled.

It also would have been more difficult for Mr. Smith if he had had extensive transferable skills from his prior jobs. Usually, the more highly skilled the PRW is then the more transferable skills the claimant will have. It is also the job of the VE to identify those transferable skills. The more that are identified then the harder it will be for the claimant to win his case.

But Mr. Smith said: (1) the VE did not consider the side effects of my medications; (2) the VE did not consider my severe pain; (3) he did not consider I have to prop up my leg 50% of the day; (4) he did not consider I walk with a cane; etc. I had to tell Mr. Smith if these restrictions were not included in the Judge's question then the VE would not consider them. If these restrictions were mandated by the medical evidence, then Mr. Smith could have a good case for an appeal. But such an appeal of a Judge's decision can take years. However, all of this could have avoided if Mr. Smith had contacted an experienced Social Security Attorney before his unsuccessful hearing who would have cross-examined the VE on these issues.

CONCLUSION: A VE will often testify at Social Security Hearings. As a claimant like Mr. Smith, you need to know the role of the VE. You need to know he may suggest other jobs you can do. You need to consult an attorney about this possibility. Please review my article:
Virginia Social Security Lawyer: How do you choose a good one?

Copyright© 2006, Jerry Lutkenhaus. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or Advertising Material under the Rules of Professional Conduct governing lawyers in Virginia . This note is designed for general information only. The information presented in this note should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

Jerry Lutkenhaus is a practitioner of Workers' Compensation and Social Security in the Richmond , Virginia area for over 30 years He was given an "AV" rating by Martindale Hubbell in 2003. Lexis Nexis listed him in the 2005 Bar Register of Preeminent Attorneys. For more information, see our websites at www.geraldlutkenhaus.com and www.virginiadisabilitylawyer.com .
This Article has been viewed 2,792 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)
» left by MB
from NY
3 years 102 days ago.
YES!! SORRY FOR THE CAPS(HABIT)
ANYHOW TO VE VERY HONEST ,GET A VERY GOOD LAWYER THATS ALL IT REALLY COMES DOWN TO..  ANSWER YES & NO QUESTIONS (THATS IT) ""UNTIL YOUR ACTUALLY ASKED A BUNCH /TONS OF QUESTIONS ABOUT YOURE PAST UP TIL YOUR CURRENT(DO NOT OVER DO IT)..  SO BE PREPARED.. YO WILL BE CROSS EXAMINED IF A VE COMES IN, SOMETIMES THEY HAVE THE VE ON SPEAKER PHONE AND LISTENS TO YOURE WHOLE CASE WITH THE JUDGE, THEN AT THE END YOU DEAL WITH THE VE SUCH AS WORK AND DEPENDING ON HOW BAD YOUR SITUATION WOULD BE TO PREVENT OR LIMIT YOU FROM WORKING....  A BIG THING IS HOW MUCH EDUCATION YOU HAVE TO SEE WHAT NEW SKILLS YOU MAY BE ABLE TO ENQUIRE..  REMEMBER THAT! IF YOURE IN COLLEGE OR ATTENDED COLLEGE , THEN LOOK OUT,YOU WILL BE AMAZED AT WHAT TYPE OF JOBS THE VE CAN COME UP WITH FOR YOU..  EXAMPLE, THEY INSTALL A VIDEO CAMERA IN YOUR HOME AND YOU BREIFLY MONITER OTHER BUILDINGS OR A COMPANY""BOY ARE THEY GOOD OR WHAT"" BET YOU NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT ONE, BUT AGAIN ALSO DEPENDS ON THE DAY AND TIME YOU GO TO COURT!!!!  "AS WE ALL KNOW"" THEN AGAIN ITS ALL IN GODS HANDS,IF ITS MEANT TO BE OR NOT!!   GOOD LUCK TO ALL...  EXPECT THE WORST,AND PRAY FOR THE BEST = )
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.